four
5,087 posts
msg #95904
- Ignore four
modified |
8/31/2010 10:43:05 AM
http://www.doineedanumbrella.com
Stock market crystal ball should work this way...
|
karennma
8,057 posts
msg #95905
- Ignore karennma |
8/31/2010 10:56:25 AM
Awww ...
that is so cute!
:>)
|
four
5,087 posts
msg #95907
- Ignore four
modified |
8/31/2010 11:29:37 AM
Thanks karennma. Did you click the link for the umbrella?
Who need expensive marketing... not these folks. Simple and Cute and Easy.
---------------
However,
...this is not cute...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-get-fooled-by-ben-bernanke-2010-08-31
|
karennma
8,057 posts
msg #95909
- Ignore karennma |
8/31/2010 12:20:36 PM
NOT "cute" at all ....
Let's see ...
Bernanke: "no double-dip recession".
No??
Right, Bozo Bernanke!! It's not a "W" shaped recession. It's an L-shaped recession. A (|______ ) lonnnng one!
Taxpayers bail out GM, and now GM's in "recovery" ... by moving their plants to Mexico?
Meanwhile 99'ers continue to live on gov't subsidies!
Can you say "L__-shaped" recession, Ben?
|
four
5,087 posts
msg #95925
- Ignore four |
9/1/2010 12:42:33 AM
... this not cute...
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/LI01Dj01.html
|
karennma
8,057 posts
msg #95931
- Ignore karennma |
9/1/2010 9:54:25 AM
Thanks, four.
That article was OUTSTANDING!
|
four
5,087 posts
msg #95953
- Ignore four |
9/2/2010 2:42:06 AM
here we go....
http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/barry-ferguson/there-is-no-economic-recovery-only-transition
|
four
5,087 posts
msg #95956
- Ignore four |
9/2/2010 10:29:49 AM
http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm
Unemployment -- enjoy the statistics :-(
|
karennma
8,057 posts
msg #95958
- Ignore karennma |
9/2/2010 10:36:55 AM
THIS is what pisses me off ...
Re:
"Even more disturbing is according to the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics), the latest statistics available in 2008 showed the average federal employee enjoyed a salary 20% higher than that of a comparable private employ. It gets worse. That figure is just the salary. It seems that the federal employee also enjoyed a benefits package (health insurance, pension, etc…) valued at $40,785 compared to the private employee’s package valued at $9,882. "
=================================
I'm around these Fed. Gov't slackers all the time. Their benefits package is why the Fed. gov't is bankrupt.
The Fed. Gov't is subsidizing millions of these "retired" slackers.
They "produced" nothing when they worked for the gov't, and they produce nothing now.
They contribute NOTHING to GDP!
|
johnpaulca
12,036 posts
msg #95959
- Ignore johnpaulca |
9/2/2010 10:46:00 AM
If you think it's bad here just visit a 3rd world country, I just spent a month in South America...what a shi$t hole.
|