cegis
235 posts
msg #31918
- Ignore cegis |
4/28/2004 7:52:03 PM
My only suggestion is to use the name (e.g.) "harami" instead of "c1", and "engulfing" instead of "c2" in the set{} commands (and the references, of course). That way, your column names will be the name of the pattern! (Particularly if you go on to define c3, c4, ...) :->
HTH,
C
|
kanuk
32 posts
msg #31919
- Ignore kanuk |
4/28/2004 10:11:29 PM
Cegis:
That's a d____ good idea! If I've read the manual correctly, new columns start at the 5th location and there isn't a whole heck of a lot of room left on the header or information line if I want to identify several candlestick patterns. Do I just change the font size (and squint)?
K
|
cegis
235 posts
msg #31926
- Ignore cegis |
4/29/2004 12:52:40 PM
kanuk,
I'm not sure if you can change the font size. You could abbreviate the names, tho. I'd think that "har" would still be better than "c1". Also, you can still define all of the columns that you want, but you'll have a left/right scroll bar to deal with. One other way to handle this is to make multiple filters, then group them all in a watch list and (re)define the columns for the patterns. I think the column selection of the Watch Lists may give you more flexibility as to the number of columns that are displayable without l/r scroll.
Then, there always a bigger monitor and/or higher resolution <G>...
HTH,
C
|
cegis
235 posts
msg #31927
- Ignore cegis |
4/29/2004 12:55:55 PM
Let me clarify: I don't think you can change the font size that SF outputs - a la using "<font color=green>name</font>" in your filter names to change color. You can always change the Text Zoom within your browser so more stuff will fit across the screen.
HTH,
C
|