chetron
2,817 posts
msg #66905
- Ignore chetron |
9/2/2008 7:58:46 PM
tomb should be able clarify SF limits and how it is handled.
i believe my "simpler" modification is invalid.
i believe my "maybe" modification is close, but it is to difficult for me to validate.
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #66928
- Ignore jimhbutton |
9/3/2008 11:10:07 AM
Hi Chetron,
Do you know why some stocks were allowed to pass through the "Warning: period length exceeded" limit while others were flagged? I am referring to your pre-debugging of the filter. Wouldn't the same glitch and programming error (e.g., too many brackets) apply to all the stocks?
Thanks,
jhb2
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #66929
- Ignore chetron |
9/3/2008 11:26:25 AM
I BELIEVE YOU ARE RIGHT. MAYBE TOMB WOULD KNOW WHY.
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #66930
- Ignore jimhbutton
modified |
9/3/2008 12:16:41 PM
I stumbled upon a stop-gap solution. I found that by bumping up my "Price < 15" criteria to "Price < 16" the anomaly in the system was bypassed. Before it had been leaving out certain sub $15 stocks (e.g., ECPG & WNR) that shouldn't have been omitted. I haven't a clue in the world why this works, but I'm not complaining.
|