sbuck143
88 posts
msg #90409
- Ignore sbuck143 |
3/26/2010 11:36:12 AM
I have two overlapping filters, one of which is a more stringent set of criteria, but will always be a smaller subset of a different filter that has more lenient criteria.
I would like the more lenient criteria filter to not have the stocks of the more stringent one in it. I realize I could code up an inverted version of the filter and stick it in the other, but if there is a cleaner way to do it, I figured I'd ask.
Seems like there should be a way to run a filter within a filter....
|
Kevin_in_GA
4,599 posts
msg #90438
- Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
3/26/2010 5:49:05 PM
Not able to do this in SF, as far as I know.
|
Eman93
4,750 posts
msg #90494
- Ignore Eman93 |
3/28/2010 7:51:50 AM
In the watch list you can have it auto update your watch list from a filter, then it will put a check mark next to other filters that were hit...
|
Kevin_in_GA
4,599 posts
msg #90497
- Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
3/28/2010 8:13:05 AM
Yes but that is not the same as running one filter inside another.
|
Eman93
4,750 posts
msg #90553
- Ignore Eman93
modified |
3/29/2010 10:54:36 PM
you can sort the list by filter hit and see quickly if it has hit just the one filter and not the other
|